Chris King Chris King's Profile Page

Chris King Chris King

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Free PDF Databricks - Pass-Sure Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pdf

With the intense competition in labor market, it has become a trend that a lot of people, including many students, workers and so on, are trying their best to get a Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification in a short time. They all long to own the useful certification that they can have an opportunity to change their present state, including get a better job, have a higher salary, and get a higher station in life and so on, but they also understand that it is not easy for them to get a Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Certification in a short time. If you are the one of the people who wants to get a certificate, we are willing to help you solve your problem.

As everybody knows, competitions appear ubiquitously in current society. In order to live a better live, people improve themselves by furthering their study, as well as increase their professional Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate skills. Once you purchase our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam material, your time and energy will reach a maximum utilization. Thus at that time, you would not need to afraid of the cruel society and peer pressure with Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Certification. In conclusion, a career enables you to live a fuller and safer life. So if you want to take an upper hand and get a well-pleasing career our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning question would be your best friend.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pdf <<

VCE Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps | Reliable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Online

If you want to get Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification and get hired immediately, you’ve come to the right place. TestsDumps offers you the best exam dump for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification. With the guidance of no less than seasoned Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate professionals, we have formulated updated actual questions for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Certified exams, over the years. To keep our questions up to date, we constantly review and revise them to be at par with the latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate syllabus for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

Topic 2

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

Topic 3

Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

Topic 4

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Topic 5

Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q52-Q57):

NEW QUESTION # 52
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with developing a RAG application that will help a small internal group of experts at their company answer specific questions, augmented by an internal knowledge base. They want the best possible quality in the answers, and neither latency nor throughput is a huge concern given that the user group is small and they're willing to wait for the best answer. The topics are sensitive in nature and the data is highly confidential and so, due to regulatory requirements, none of the information is allowed to be transmitted to third parties.
Which model meets all the Generative Al Engineer's needs in this situation?

A. OpenAI GPT-4
B. Dolly 1.5B
C. Llama2-70B
D. BGE-large

Answer: D

Explanation:
Problem Context: The Generative AI Engineer needs a model for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application that provides high-quality answers, where latency and throughput are not major concerns. The key factors areconfidentialityandsensitivityof the data, as well as the requirement for all processing to be confined to internal resources without external data transmission.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Dolly 1.5B: This model does not typically support RAG applications as it's more focused on image generation tasks.
* Option B: OpenAI GPT-4: While GPT-4 is powerful for generating responses, its standard deployment involves cloud-based processing, which could violate the confidentiality requirements due to external data transmission.
* Option C: BGE-large: The BGE (Big Green Engine) large model is a suitable choice if it is configured to operate on-premises or within a secure internal environment that meets regulatory requirements.
Assuming this setup, BGE-large can provide high-quality answers while ensuring that data is not transmitted to third parties, thus aligning with the project's sensitivity and confidentiality needs.
* Option D: Llama2-70B: Similar to GPT-4, unless specifically set up for on-premises use, it generally relies on cloud-based services, which might risk confidential data exposure.
Given the sensitivity and confidentiality concerns,BGE-largeis assumed to be configurable for secure internal use, making it the optimal choice for this scenario.

NEW QUESTION # 53
A Generative AI Engineer has been asked to build an LLM-based question-answering application. The application should take into account new documents that are frequently published. The engineer wants to build this application with the least cost and least development effort and have it operate at the lowest cost possible.
Which combination of chaining components and configuration meets these requirements?

A. For the question-answering application, prompt engineering and an LLM are required to generate answers.
B. The LLM needs to be frequently with the new documents in order to provide most up-to-date answers.
C. For the application a prompt, an agent and a fine-tuned LLM are required. The agent is used by the LLM to retrieve relevant content that is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.
D. For the application a prompt, a retriever, and an LLM are required. The retriever output is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Problem Context: The task is to build an LLM-based question-answering application that integrates new documents frequently with minimal costs and development efforts.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Utilizes a prompt and a retriever, with the retriever output being fed into the LLM. This setup is efficient because it dynamically updates the data pool via the retriever, allowing the LLM to provide up-to-date answers based on the latest documents without needing tofrequently retrain the model. This method offers a balance of cost-effectiveness and functionality.
* Option B: Requires frequent retraining of the LLM, which is costly and labor-intensive.
* Option C: Only involves prompt engineering and an LLM, which may not adequately handle the requirement for incorporating new documents unless it's part of an ongoing retraining or updating mechanism, which would increase costs.
* Option D: Involves an agent and a fine-tuned LLM, which could be overkill and lead to higher development and operational costs.
Option Ais the most suitable as it provides a cost-effective, minimal development approach while ensuring the application remains up-to-date with new information.

NEW QUESTION # 54
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system that will answer questions on currently unfolding news topics.
As such, it pulls information from a variety of sources including articles and social media posts. They are concerned about toxic posts on social media causing toxic outputs from their system.
Which guardrail will limit toxic outputs?

A. Implement rate limiting
B. Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM.
C. Reduce the amount of context Items the system will Include in consideration for its response.
D. Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The system answers questions on unfolding news topics using articles and social media, with a concern about toxic outputs from toxic inputs. A guardrail must limit toxicity in the LLM's responses. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM
* Curating input sources (e.g., verified accounts) reduces exposure to toxic content at the data ingestion stage, directly limiting toxic outputs. This is a proactive guardrail aligned with data quality control.
* Databricks Reference:"Control input data quality to mitigate unwanted LLM behavior, such as toxicity"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Implement rate limiting
* Rate limiting controls request frequency, not content quality. It prevents overload but doesn't address toxicity in social media inputs or outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Rate limiting is for performance, not safety:"Use rate limits to manage compute load"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Reduce the amount of context items the system will include in consideration for its response
* Reducing context might limit exposure to some toxic items but risks losing relevant information, and it doesn't specifically target toxicity. It's an indirect, imprecise fix.
* Databricks Reference: Context reduction is for efficiency, not safety:"Adjust context size based on performance needs"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly
* Logging and analyzing responses is reactive, identifying toxicity after it occurs rather than preventing it. Monthly analysis doesn't limit real-time toxic outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Monitoring is for auditing, not prevention:"Log outputs for post-hoc analysis, but use input filters for safety"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the most effective guardrail, proactively filtering toxic inputs from unverified sources, which aligns with Databricks' emphasis on data quality as a primary safety mechanism for LLM systems.

NEW QUESTION # 55
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?

A. Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering.
B. Split articles by 10 day blocks and return the block closest to the query.
C. pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles.
D. Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.

NEW QUESTION # 56
A Generative Al Engineer would like an LLM to generate formatted JSON from emails. This will require parsing and extracting the following information: order ID, date, and sender email. Here's a sample email:

They will need to write a prompt that will extract the relevant information in JSON format with the highest level of output accuracy.
Which prompt will do that?

A. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in a human-readable format.
B. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
Here's an example: {"date": "April 16, 2024", "sender_email": "sarah.lee925@gmail.com", "order_id":
"RE987D"}
C. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. Return the extracted information in JSON format.
D. You will receive customer emails and need to extract date, sender email, and order ID. You should return the date, sender email, and order ID information in JSON format.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Problem Context: The goal is to parse emails to extract certain pieces of information and output this in a structured JSON format. Clarity and specificity in the prompt design will ensure higher accuracy in the LLM' s responses.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Provides a general guideline but lacks an example, which helps an LLM understand the exact format expected.
* Option B: Includes a clear instruction and a specific example of the output format. Providing an example is crucial as it helps set the pattern and format in which the information should be structured, leading to more accurate results.
* Option C: Does not specify that the output should be in JSON format, thus not meeting the requirement.
* Option D: While it correctly asks for JSON format, it lacks an example that would guide the LLM on how to structure the JSON correctly.
Therefore,Option Bis optimal as it not only specifies the required format but also illustrates it with an example, enhancing the likelihood of accurate extraction and formatting by the LLM.

NEW QUESTION # 57
......

Many candidates may think that it will take a long time to prapare for the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. Actually, it only takes you about twenty to thirty hours to practice our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam simulation. We believe that the professional guidance will help you absorb the knowledge quickly. You will have a wide range of chance after obtaining the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certificate. You need to have a brave attempt. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training engine will help you realize your dreams.

VCE Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps: https://www.testsdumps.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_real-exam-dumps.html